Talk:Worst Episode Ever/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 16:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• Wiklink first mention of Comic Book Guy in lead
• Wikilink The Android Dungeon in lead
• Sentences with quotes need citations
• LA Times, Seattle Times are italicized
• Wikilink IGN in ref
• Ref 12: use consistent date formatting

On hold for seven days while above minor issues get addressed. Ruby2010 comment! 20:51, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

All done! Thanks for the review. Theleftorium ^(talk) 21:16, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Looks great. Pass for GA. Ruby2010 comment! 21:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)