Talk:Worsley/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 20:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Initial review
[edit]Not at all bad for a "Start-class" article. Should make GA-class, although that [clarification] flag will need urgent attention; and, as per Eccles, Greater Manchester, we aught to have a "climate" section.
- I have removed the clarification request and the uncertain text that lead to it. The source offers no more information that could help, so I've placed a request on the talk page just in case someone knows for sure. Parrot of Doom (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I will put the article On Hold whilst these are addressed; but I will carry on with the review anyway.Pyrotec (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Climate data isn't available for the settlement per se, but a sentence could be added that Eccles has a similar climate to the rest of Greater Manchester and add some data from the Ringway weather station. Would that be enough? Nev1 (talk) 20:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, OK by me.Pyrotec (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Climate data isn't available for the settlement per se, but a sentence could be added that Eccles has a similar climate to the rest of Greater Manchester and add some data from the Ringway weather station. Would that be enough? Nev1 (talk) 20:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Done, on both articles. Nev1 (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehnsive, wide-ranging article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
This is possibly a good contender for WP:FAC. I don't particularly like the WP:lead, but its adequate and I'm awarding GA-status now. Congratulations on the article.Pyrotec (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)