Talk:World of Wearable Art

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Does there really need to be a list of the cars? Especially since it's not complete. --Helenalex 18:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've reduced the length of the list. I don't see a problem with having it, although someone needs to go through and link more of the individual vehicles to articles. The number of pictures of cars is excessive. I would think that homes for most of them could be found on the individual car articles.-gadfium 19:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My concern is that this article is becoming an annex of the World of Wearable Art museum web page. It's obvious that the main contributor to this article is COI, and if that person really wants to survive the upcoming "Articles for Deletion" discussion (which will happen soon if the article continues to expand without fixing the problems) then that person would do well to concentrate efforts on finding citations to non-biased news reports in magazines and newspapers giving significant coverage to the museum. Better to wait until later to add in the content with blatantly obvious (but fixable) copyright issues. We don't need to see any more photographs. We need Reliable, third-party sources not connected with the museum itself. OfficeGirl 19:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the lists of cars and artists should be removed - they're not really necessary for an encyclopedia article (we could include lists of the paintings, lists of prior shows...all edging toward "indiscriminate collections of information"). I'm bold so I'll remove them myself. Maybe the most important few should be re-included? Are there are couple of those cars that are the "stars"? Anyway, I'll also work a little on including some sources. (I found this via "random article" and it sounds like a cool museum.) Dreamyshade (talk) 09:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awards??

Surely the article should talk about the background to the awards, not just the modern museum. This article seems to have missed the point... Nengscoz416 (talk) 03:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.notjustalabel.com/editorial/2017-world-of-wearablearttm-awards-call-for-applicants. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Triptothecottage (talk) 00:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]