Talk:World War II/AID vote archive

World War II (22 votes, stays until December 27, 2005)

Nominated November 22, 2005; needs at least 15 votes by December 27, 2005

Support:

1. Tarret 00:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
2. ike9898 00:33, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
3. Spawn Man 00:40, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
4. RENTASTRAWBERRY ^{FOR LET?} röck 01:15, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
5. Dna-Dennis ^{talk - contribs} 19:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
6. Wiki-Ed 11:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
7. Oberiko 20:57, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
8. ddlamb 00:41, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
9. Afro Squirrel 10:35, 01 December 2005 (UTC)
10. TomStar81 22:24, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
11. Carabinieri 21:45, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
12. Magicmonster 23:10, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
13. Gflores ^Talk 20:54, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
14. Leithp (talk) 12:18, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
15. TheNameOfTheGame 2:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
16. Hydriotaphia 16:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
17. Fang Aili 14:00, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
18. CyberSpork 10:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
19. Paul James Cowie 21:31, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
20. Wikiacc (talk) 01:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
21. Schwael 15:02, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
22. Jcmaco 00:57, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
23. Guapovia 23:12, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• A very important event in world history. This should at least be a featured article standard article like the World War I even if it doesn't become a featured article. Tarret 00:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• In my opinion, the World War II article is generally very good in its present state, and not very far from FA status. An improvement drive could very well bring it to "perfection". Dna-Dennis ^{talk - contribs} 19:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
• It needs work - I disagree that it is close to FA standard. It is constantly vandalised (sometimes revisionism) and the quality has suffered. Wiki-Ed 11:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Very good article, but still slightly confusing. More subsections? Guapovia 23:12, 17 December 2005 (UTC)