Talk:World Scholar's Cup

I don't think that Western US was 2nd in scholar's quiz...as i recall, we got fifth. however, i do not remember who 2nd place was. perhaps '06 all-stars?

Academic decathlete 21:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Academic decathlete

File:Debateshowcase2011.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Debateshowcase2011.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Studentdebatebeijing2011.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Studentdebatebeijing2011.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Scholarsbowlkl2011.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Scholarsbowlkl2011.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Lead

The lead kind of sounds like some sort of ad...Correctron (talk) 06:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Correctron I was thinking about trimming the list on there too, since it's unsourced. What do you think? Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 01:58, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on World Scholar's Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111008001125/http://scholarscup.org/app/webroot/files/Debate%20Guidelines(1).pdf to http://scholarscup.org/app/webroot/files/Debate%20Guidelines(1).pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Tone/Style

The tone of this article seems overall to be unencyclopedic. Some passages that I believe evidence this:

"Often used as an interjection or a response to a statement, this onomatopoeia has become a sensation among World Scholar's Cup participants. It may also be used in a call-and-response format, as demonstrated by staff members at many competitions. Often, staff members will call out the word and find themselves echoed by hundreds of students. The word has also made appearances in Facebook statuses, and at the 2011 Global Round in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Deputy Prime Minister of Higher Education in Malaysia Dr. Hou Kok Chung Saifuddin Abdullah used it during his closing remarks. The word "Pwaa" is used as a pun in various places during the contest. Examples of usage: Pwaasome (Awesome), Pwaala Lumpur (Kuala Lumpur), Singapwaa (Singapore), Pwaalified (qualified), Live long and pwaasper (live long and prosper) or just "Pwaa"."

No citations; use of the emotive word "sensation"; arguably shouldn't be in the article at all (not notable enough).

"In 2014, during the Global Round, Director of Social Stuff Burch Wang revealed that he felt that the competition needed a song to capture the never-ending feeling of the event. Just after the opening ceremony, he played his song, "Endless", for the first time. It was an instant hit with the scholars, as it was constantly asked to be sung by Burch during the course of the Global Round."

My impression is that Wang should be referred to by his last, not first, name (I could misunderstand how that name works, though); "Director of Social Stuff" is clearly a jocular title and should arguably be put in quotation marks (as is "Benevolent dictator for life" on Guido van Rossum's page); "scholar" does not mean "participant in the World Scholar's Cup", whether or not the term is used that way by the Cup.

In my view these issues pervade the entire article. The whole thing reads like an ad. Extensive rewriting may be needed: thoughts?

Yours sincerely, "spectreoflieftism". 04:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Agree: This is probably because of the extensive use of sources from the organization's own website; I'll see what else I can do to clean up stuff here Honest-sophistry (talk) 22:03, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Agree: As a participant of the program, I can admit, our program uses so many emotive words, the original article writer probably struggles to write it in an encyclopedic way. Let me try neutralize and 'encyclopeed' it. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

COVID-19 pandemic

Should I add an info about the cancellation of 2020 rounds due to the COVID-19 pandemic? And where? Cause I'm confused where to put it. GeraldWL 10:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)