Talk:Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

International relations: United Nations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Military history: Post-Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Post-Cold War task force

Notability

I noticed that all of the sources used for this article were published by the UN. Although self-published material like this can be used to verify specific pieces of information about the subject, such sources are generally insufficient for establishing notability. If you intend to keep working on this article, be sure to find external sources--if they exist. If not, the article may be deleted. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The string "Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict" yields nearly 70k results in a Google search, many of which are independent of the working group or the UN (see 1, 2, 3). I think the subject is clearly notable, although the article does not adequately assert its basis for notability in the present form. DickClarkMises (talk) 06:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the inputs. I made a few changes to the text and inserted links outside the UN website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mason2011 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

Here's my feedback on the actual content of the article:

Be careful of the tone that is used in the article. Although most readers will agree that the use of children in armed conflicts is a "heinous act", it is inappropriate to describe it as such in an encyclopedia article. Take a look at WP:TONE for a guideline on this issue.
The sentence "Since its inception, there are progresses in this field of particular importance to the international community." should be expanded upon greatly. It is insufficient to say that progress has been made. Instead, explain to the reader what the progress has been.
Everything from the third paragraph onwards ("Negotiation in the context of the United Nations Security Council ...") is completely irrelevant to this topic.
Subtopics that should be addressed in greater detail: the history of the working group, their specific goals, what progress they've made, public opinions on their actions thus far.

Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 15:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]