Talk:Workers' International Industrial Union

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

WIIU in current practice

The WIIU in current practice section is somewhat redundant and contradictory, and it may include prohibited Original Research.

There is likewise a question concerning the "re-launch" date of the organization; the following web page asserts that it was revived in 2008, rather than in 2009:

http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?do=discuss&group=&discussionid=3315

(The date of the website launch may or may not coincide...)

I don't have the information available to determine which assertions are accurate. Hopefully, someone with the appropriate information can improve this article. Richard Myers (talk) 18:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The launch date should be made the official founding constitution date, but should be followed by the organizing history behind said date i.e. U.S. Constitution and American Revolutionary War. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.171.114.108 (talk) 08:39, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalist Class

Unlike the IWW, WIIU tactics called for a general lockout of the capitalist class. Instead of leaving the means of production to the capitalists and their scabs, the WIIU calls for workers to take possession of the means of production and begin operating them in the interests of society.[11]

This line seems contrary to the history and ongoing messages of the IWW as described on its article. As well, the reference given does not seem to support the comparitive claim. See here for a copy of this source: http://archive.org/stream/cu31924052844218#page/n995/mode/2up Djr13 (talk) 13:57, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]