Talk:Work Bus

Work Bus has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Work Bus is part of the The Office (American season 9) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 28, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
August 22, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by The Office task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Work Bus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 09:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll be your reviewer for this one. I'm going to give the article a read through now and add any points I notice below. As you've already done several Office episode related articles, I'll apologise now as I'm sure that'll mean that anything I do find will be rather annoyingly nitpicky in nature! I took the liberty of adding the WikiProject templates to the talk page, using Talk:Welcome Party as a template for checking the importance levels etc - I didn't add a quality level as I'm sure it'll be changing to GA shortly! :) Miyagawa (talk) 09:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead: Do you think you need to include the inline citation for Brian Cranston in the lead? You use the same citation for the same point in the production section. I'll leave it up to you as I don't see it as being a major issue, but I don't think it needs to be there.

"convinces Dwight (Rainn Wilson) that the building is unsafe, Dwight rents a bus and sets up the office inside" - is it possible to reword this slightly so that there is a connection between the two events as the first led to the second. The way its worded at the moment, that isn't clear. Perhaps changing it to "resulting in Dwight renting a bus and moving the office inside".

Plot: Could you reword it slightly to make certain that Kevin's ability to do math related to pies isn't in order to please Pam.

Before the line about Dwight climbing onto the roof, there needs to be a mention that he is convinced to drive the bus to the pie stand.

Production: Might be a nice touch to mention that Cranston had previously directed episodes of How I Met Your Mother and Modern Family if you can find suitable sources.

And as far as I can see thats everything! It's already mostly there, so once you've addressed those three points I'm happy to pass this one for a GA. Miyagawa (talk) 09:23, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, so let's run the template:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

So I'm happy to promote this one to GA status. Nice job. Miyagawa (talk) 18:32, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Work Bus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]