Talk:Work (Ciara song)

Work (Ciara song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 10, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comment

"Work" is a song performed by R&B/pop singer Ciara. It is the third U.S. single from her third studio album, Fantasy Ride. The song was written and produced by Danja.

Protection

can we remove the protection from this page and start it up now that we have an official release date and also a video.

http://www.radio1.gr/music/forthcoming_uk_singles.htm UK/Radio 1

(Lil-unique1 (talk) 11:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Main article

This page should be the main article for "Work", instead of "Work (Ciara Song)", to coincide with every other song article on Wikipedia.

$ĐШЧ ^{• • • ►} 12:11, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Work (Ciara song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Touch Of Light (talk · contribs) 04:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Pass - Article presents a clear, concise view of the subject matter, it flows logically.

2. Factually accurate?:

Pass - Sources and references are correct, verifiable, and orderly. Strong supporting references.

3. Broad in coverage?:

Pass - Complete and thorough

Maybe too broad? Need help on this one Touch Of Light (talk) 05:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

4. Neutral point of view?:

Pass - Article maintains a Neutral Point of View

5. Article stability?

Pass - Minor editing conflicts and different views on cover art -otherwise it is fine

6. Images?:

Pass - Provides legal, correct images for many sections.

Touch Of Light (talk) 05:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any other issues you'd like to point out? No grammatical errors? Pancake (talk) 11:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Work (Ciara song)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 02:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: One found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 02:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:06, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Originally, Fantasy Ride was announced to be divided into three different discs, each representing a particular sound. Ungrammatical, rewrite in good plain English.

The song and "High Price" were at one point in contention of serving as the album's lead single Ungrammatical.

The song's hook consists of repeated shouty remarks to "Work! Work!" "shouty"?

~~Overuse of "The song" as the start of sentences.~~

Sarah Rodman of The Boston Globe named the song the album's most essential and praised Elliott as the best guest artist "most essential"

'' Andy Kellman of Allmusic was negative on the song, rewrite in good plain English.

On the issue dated July 11, 2009, "Work" entered the UK Singles Chart at number 71. "On"?

In its third week, it rose four placements to acquire a peak of number 52 "placements"?

'' Ciara then signals her dancers to a sand dune in front of the site, for a group choreography, all wearing white tops, torn blue jeans, ????

~~This is not reasonably good prose, please find someone who can write good plain English to copy-edit throughout.~~

Complies sufficiently with MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Adequately sourced, RS, no evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Reasonable coverage for a minor hit.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
NPOV
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Images captioned and FUR provided. Audio clip is <10% and FUR provided.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for seven days for a thorough copy-edit. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:34, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I guess this passes muster now. Listing as GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:02, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have put a request at WP:GOCE. Pancake (talk) 13:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been copy edited. Pancake (talk) 14:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.