Talk:Woollen industry in Wales/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 11:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Lede

• " The Shrewsbury drapers took a dominant role in distributing Welsh cloth. " -is it worth mentioning the firm article you started here?

• Done. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

• I would expect the lede to tell me something about the nature of the product, a basic summary, rather than just a rough history outline.

• Done. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Prehistoric times

• Dinas Powys hillfort in Glamorganshire -it is called the Vale of Glamorgan now, Glamorganshire sounds rather old fashioned nowadays, but if the 2011 source calls it that fair enough.

• Fixed. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

• Is there nothing more which can be said or early medieval period? You'd think there would be a bit more on archeological finds pointing to it or something.

• I added a bit. There does not seem to be a whole lot written about on the subject. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Medieval

• "the monasteries of Margam, Neath and Tintern a" -the monasteries rather than town should be piped here, e.g Margam Abbey.

• Fixed. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

This is quite a good article but it would be good to see more on the nature of the industry, more on methods of production, how wool was transported to market etc. It's fine for GA though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

• Not sure how much the article should overlap with more general articles like Textile manufacturing by pre-industrial methods, Textile manufacture during the Industrial Revolution or Wool. I have added "See also" links to those articles. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that's fine.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC)