Talk:Woodlark/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 12:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

• Hi, before I review this article in depth, here are some essential issues at first glance. FunkMonk (talk) 12:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
• Sources need to be added after each paragraph. As of now, many sentences end without citation.
• The article is on the short side, but I'm sure more info could be squeezed out of the sources? It is not as if this is a largely unknown, remotely living bird.
• The description section seems a bit lacking. I can see many distinct features just on the images that are not mentioned in the text.
• The section could also use discussion of what differences there are between the subspecies.
• Taxonomy section is almost completely devoid of taxonomic info. Who described it, does it have junior synonyms? What are its relatives?

• this may help with the last two points, and this is the original placement in the genus AlaudaJimfbleak - talk to me? 12:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

• Anyone there? FunkMonk (talk) 17:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
• No response, failed. FunkMonk (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)