This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
About 2k of my properly-referenced contributions to this article have been removed. [1]. I somewhat agree with User:Collect that the info he removed is puffery, though that is the only information I was able to find other than random bank robbery information (which I assume to be not notable). I would think that the history (over some years) is more notable than "Woohoo! We got Number 1 (at some time in the past)!" which is essentially what it said before I got here. [2] On the other hand, I'm concerned that User:Dmoh77 may have a conflict of interest, for having deleted the same less-than-glowing passage twice. -- ke4roh (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
User:Jrrfundingaccuses me of a conflict of interest, but I do not work for a bank or any financial institution. I walked through Wal-Mart one day and became curious about the bank therein, visited article, and was surprised at its puffery, so I attempted to bring some balance to the article. I have noticed subsequent edits that are apparent conflicts of interest and sockpuppetry, and because of this and a real-world friend's complaint about Wikipedia's favorable bias for corporations, I have tried to keep this article honest. -- ke4roh (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]