Talk:Wooden Spoon Society

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 January 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Rugby union Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Wooden Spoon Society is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Advert template

I am going to add an advert template to this article, because it clearly isn't written from a neutral point of view. At the very least, words and phrases like the following need to be removed:

"dedicated to" (repeated)
"harnessing the spirit and values of rugby"
"notable recent projects"
"sporting legends"
"time and energy"
"strong relationships"
"Grand Slam Hero"
"voice of sport"

Additionally, the Founding section should be incorporated into the rest of the article in a more formal style - avoid "the charity was born...", for example. The same applies to the Management section, though I can see little in the way of significant information there. It contains the most blatant example of the non-neutral point of view, I think: "Spoon is pleased to announce"!

I am hesitant to make all these changes myself, as I really have no previous knowledge of the charity and no expertise on the subjects at hand. I may return to make them myself when I have more time on my hands, however, if nobody else does. - Estesark (talk) 21:18, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wooden Spoon Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150220130019/http://www.royal.gov.uk/ThecurrentRoyalFamily/ThePrincessRoyal/Charitiesandpatronages.aspx to https://www.royal.gov.uk/ThecurrentRoyalFamily/ThePrincessRoyal/Charitiesandpatronages.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]