Talk:Wood's despatch

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Why should i delete my article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zubinism (talk • contribs)

Hello there. Nobody said you should delete your article, but someone else may do that. As for the reason why, read the deletion notice in the article: there reason is clearly indicated in it, and by clicking on it (it's the "original research" link) you may get to know more about it, and how to avoid making that particular mistake. --Nehwyn (talk) 18:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nehwyn's incredible waffle above does not help very much. An "original research" tag was inappropriate anyway. A quick Google search suggests that this is not an hoax but you must add a couple of external links to confirm that it is not an hoax and that it is notable. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 21:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, I never said it was a hoax; I tagget it as "original research". The two are different after all. --Nehwyn (talk) 09:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The good and the bad

In this edit someone added

it strongly criticised the literature of the east

and yet in a few external places I find the note

6. Literature and Culture. The Despatch recognized the importance and value of Indian literature and culture.

It does seem that the recommendation for instruction in English at higher levels would devalue Eastern writings, but I've not read enough to know that. I'm going to remove the addition, in favor of someone eventually adding a cited conclusion on what was said regarding Indian literature, which of course had little relation to what was done. Shenme (talk) 03:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Define deppach

Define despatch in history 122.161.66.174 (talk) 15:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]