Talk:Wonderful Days (TV series)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 3 April 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
– Other article changed title. Can be handled with a hatnote. Unreal7 (talk) 22:18, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. I see no value to readers or editors by removing the disambiguation. This will just lead to incorrect links down the road. Since it's already disambiguated, the current setup is the optimal one. Also, while the page has moved, the title of the film is still "Wonderful Days", that hasn't changed. --Gonnym (talk) 23:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support. This is now the only article using this title, but even if it wasn't it would still be the overwhelming WP:PRIMARYUSAGE over the film (pageviews). - Station1 (talk) 05:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - per Gonnym. Neither page has exceptionally high page views, so I don't think its worthwhile to use that metric. Also, there are similar disambiguation pages which we would often WP:DABCOMBINE - Wonderful Day, The Wonderful Day - so there is potential for confusion with any of the entries listed on those. Best to disambiguate all. -- Netoholic @ 07:39, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Gonnym. Mikus (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. The stats quo is better. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.