Talk:Women in WWE/Archive 1

Archive 1

Images

Hm... I don't think we need all these images here. They detract from the text in the article, which should be the focus of the entry. --Jtalledo (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Quite the contrary indeed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.220.92.10 (talk • contribs) 14:26, May 27, 2006

I suggest that all female employees before Sunny's debut should not be counted as 'Divas', since it's all an issue of contention on who's a Diva and who's not. The WWE only used and popularized the term 'Diva' post-Sunny and Sable anyway.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.236.182.200 (talk • contribs) 22:28, October 17, 2006

Exactly, I second this. Also, the best indication of who's a WWE Diva, is if they have ever been listed on the WWE Divas subsite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.52.92.25 (talk • contribs) 11:10, January 26, 2007 For example, Hiroko and Beth Phoenix (or Moolah and Mae for the matter) were NEVER listed on the Divas section when they were on the main rosters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.52.86.222 (talk • contribs) 11:13, January 26, 2007

Believe it or not...Nicole Bass WAS listed on the Divas subsite when she was with the WWF. Thats why she counts, even if her looks are gag-worthy. Its not always the quality of the eye candy that is the qualification, like pretty Stephanie O'Mac would not be appropriately classified as a 'Diva' cos she was never promoted as 'eye candy' in any sense.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Haleth (talk • contribs) 09:37, May 1, 2007

Are they models?

Are the WWE Divas considered models? And if so should their measurements be listed in their respective pages? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.68.248.200 (talk) 04:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

Their measurements were never listed on the WWE website...they are primarily eye candy-cum-professional wrestling performers, not really professional models in a sense who MODELS for props aka clothing and lingerie...—Preceding unsigned comment added by Haleth (talk • contribs) 09:35, May 1, 2007

Well not exactly, they are models in a sence. not tyra banks or jenifer hawkins models but they are none the less, they dont model themselves to sell a product but they are models, so i agree with the first guy (who didnt sign his post so i dont know his name)so list there mesurements --Metal to the Max! 09:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Are they bi?

are the WWE divas bisexual/ gay? in numerous occasions divas have been making out with one another and i was wondering, if they are gay/bi, what diva is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.94.53.112 (talk • contribs) 19:38, March 13, 2007

Sign your posts in future (type ~~~~). Their sexuality is their own business, not yours or anyone else's. No-one can know for sure unless they come out, and until such time they should be assumed to be straight. Koberulz 07:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

No, we shouldn't presume to know their (or anyone's) sexuality at all. --Melissa Della 16:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Probably Gay For Pay. At least where WWE is concerned.

Chicks can make out with each other all the time, iv gotton many female opinions with this and they say its not such a big deal, they dont feel the urge to (that would be questionable to their sexuality) but they can do it with no big deal. So i know many of them are married or engaged so we dont know their full lives because they deserve some privacy. And Koberules cant say its their own bussiness and none of ours because its also none of out bussiness if they are married and so on, but its on their pages none the less. --Metal to the Max! 10:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Divasdonewyork.jpg

Image:Divasdonewyork.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:WWE Diva Search.JPG

Image:WWE Diva Search.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

2008 Playboy Thanks

Whoever removed the 2008 playboy diva Sharmell thanks because there's no way that Queen Sharmell will be in Playboy. number 1 her and Booker are married so I don't think he would alow that and number 2 if the storyline will still be going on with the Queen & King thing then the Queen won't be in Playboy so yeah. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.6.118.236 (talk) 21:06, August 22, 2007 (UTC)

2002 section

This part needs a major rewrite. It separate the company with two sets of divas: the wrestlers and the eye candy. Saying that one set of divas competed in these type of matches while another set competed in another set is quite unaccurate, especially considering that Lita, Trish, Gail, and Ivory were part of numerous B&P and bikini matches, while many of the other group competed in regular matches. Mshake3 16:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Divas vanishing?

I just noticed, all of the divas have vanished from wwe.com. Are they making a new site for the divas, has a mass firing occured, or did something else happen? Just about every reference to the divas aside from the title history page has vanished. 24.177.12.47 04:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I saw that also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.226.221.250 (talk) 06:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I really don't know what happened. Probably the site is currently in construction or there has been a conflict about the Women's Division. They just had the Diva Search; why would they now get rid of them?? Derrty2033 06:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I hope thats the case, Derrty2033. if they dumped the divas I am firmly a TNA Wrestling watcher from now on.FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 17:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

If they were just doing construction, I don't think they'd go back and remove previous show results? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.203.32 (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

If its a construction then they would delete the profiles from wwe.com after they put the new site on the web, and if a mass firing has happened then im not watching wwe anymore! whats the bet it was a group of fat ugly single mothers who complain about how ugly they are and get jeleous of the divas looking so so hot and sexy had a major sook about the site. --Metal to the Max! 07:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC) and just for the record, i found a loophole on wwe.com that takes u into the old daily divas page. in the search bar type wwe>Superstars>Divas>Daily Diva

Whoa your right it did work! WWE Daily Divas archive. And Max, as I said before at the risk of repeating myself, I'm there with you on boycotting the WWE. I mean come on they would have Big Dick Johnson on that show but yet they pink-slipped the divas. Thats insane troll logic! FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 15:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah but here in Australia we dont get TNA so without WWE we have nothing, but if they have fired the Divas WWE is looking at loosing half their ratings if not more.--Metal to the Max! 11:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

It cant have been a mass firing because that wouldn't work...on so many levels. My guess is that they are just constructing the divas page for the new diva that won the diva search of 2007...DIVA!Halo legend 00 11:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

A ten-diva match is scheduled for the Survivor Series, so they clearly aren't fired. Mshake3 00:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

And heres the confirmation on that match Diva's Battle Royal. So it must be a site alteration of some sort. They would not fire them if they are promoting a match....thank god! FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 02:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Well i didnt quite think they were fired, i mean thats just stupid, and Mr McMahon may be a prick, but he's not stupid. And there is sign of divas on WWE.com now, there is a vedeo gallery of Eve, the new Diva search winner. well i think everyone is thinking the same thing, thank god!!! --Metal to the Max! 10:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Now the diva's section is back! Looks like this conversation's done....much to my delight. :-D FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 00:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)