Talk:Women and Memory Forum

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I believe this article should not be deleted because of the following reasons: 1- WMF is a significant research organization that contribute positively to the production of knowledge on gender and women's studies in the Arab Region 2- There is a public demand for this article while concerned students and scholars want to check this wiki entry 3- The article includes credible references; however due to the fact that this is my first time to create a wiki article, these references are not properly formatted

Now that the references are properly formatted, I have to say that they're not useful. They certainly are credible -- but they're not references to anything that has been said by a reliable source that demonstrates any notability for this topic. They are references that demonstrate that the things that you've cited exist, and those don't have any utility in this context. The other two arguments you have advanced don't have any reference to any Wikipedia policy and are merely the assertions of someone who is obviously concerned with the organization; essentially, self-serving advertising. If you have some references where an arm's-length third-party expert source of opinion, writing in a credible publication like a book, magazine or newspaper, has said that this organization has any notability, I suggest you add them as soon as possible. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:25, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

=Status and Advice

at any rate, it does show enough notability to pass speedy. References are not necessary for that, but, exactly as Accounting4Taste says, better references will be needed to stay in Wikipedia. You need to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases). But much more important, the current material is in large part taken from their web site, and that is unacceptable. You can however give us permission if you own the material or can persuade the forum, either by putting a suitable license on your web page, or by sending us permission. The procedures are described at WP:DCM, and need to be followed exactly. I advise you to improve this article very quickly, before the article gets deleted by a regular deletion process. Otherwise, rewrite it entirely--not just paraphrase. As reviewing administrator, I need to remove it, but I am rewriting a little of it as a placeholder. I advise you to take care of this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. DGG ( talk ) 20:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Women and Memory Forum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110720132734/http://www.wmf.org.eg/en to http://wmf.org.eg/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Women and Memory Forum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Women and Memory Forum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]