Talk:Womance

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Womance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 February 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Gender studies

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Sociology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Womance be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Okay but why not flo-mance? Womance doesn’t have a ring to it at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjanney08 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Flash in the pan. A tiny bit of usage, briefly, but this WP:NEO did not make the cut. WP:NOTDICTIONARY.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After being accused of "drive-by tagging," I return to detail my searches. JSTOR had three hits, all transcription errors. (e.g.: this 1939 article It falls into the class to which belong Dmitri WIerejkowski's Womance of leonardo da Vtnci and Rachel Annand Taylor's leonardo tfie Florentine presumably mechanicallly transcribed from a printed journal.") More to the point, is WP:NEO which reads: "To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term." If we are to keep this article, that sort of source needs to be cited in the article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Female bonding is a plausible target for a merge.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

it is about female Platonism. what is so great about that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.14.116 (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]