Talk:Wolf in the Snow/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 05:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 05:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most plots have a lot more detail, from the beginning to the end. This is more of a synopsis of a movie that hasn't come out yet.

It's a wordless picture book so it's not going to be too long but more can definitely be added. Want to get my hands back on the book before making this change. Best, Barkeep49 (talk)

Done

The lead has to be longer than just two sentences, as it does not summarize the whole article yet.

The lead was three sentences but I get your point :). Each paragraph is now represented by a sentence in the LEAD.

You should go into detail for some of the reviews, especially from major newspapers.

Added some quotes. Thoughts? Best, Barkeep49 (talk)

Last reference does not have the same format as the others.

Fixed? I know this is super important at FA but have always been glad it's more relaxed at GA. I know it to be something I'm not necessarily great with. Best, Barkeep49 (talk)

Should be it for now. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nova Crystallis: I believe I have addressed your comments. Let me know what you think. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing. I think you should rename your criticism section to "Reception and awards," criticism has a negative connotation. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 22:54, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Thanks for the reminder of the MOS suggested heading title. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 04:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]