This article was nominated for deletion on 13 August 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The article currently devotes too much to the case. On one hand one might as well make it an article about the case rather than the subject, on the other extreme it is practically a COATRACK. Part of this is due to repeated inclusions of the same points (i.e. different parties referencing the online unsatisfaction when it can be grouped together). Plus its just a court case, is it even notable or even just NEWS for it to be included here? Zhanzhao (talk) 22:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
