Talk:Withers LLP
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Withers LLP article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Notability problem
[edit]The current sourcing does not sufficiently establish notability. There is little that is sourced to reliable, third-party sources here. The items in the awards section, while they may at first sound significant, reflect honors that are each given to hundreds of law firms, so they don't reach the level of awards that qualify as notability in themselves. --Nat Gertler (talk) 05:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English