Talk:Witham Friary
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Coordinate error
[edit]{{geodata-check}}
The following coordinate fixes are needed for Witham Friary. Marker is about 1000 feet off. Here's where it should be. 51°10'6.21"N 2°22'4.28"W —76.105.145.143 (talk) 09:15, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- I disagree. When I click on the coords at the top of the article it takes me straight to Witham Friary, Somerset. The coords you have given seem to be somewhere is Cannock Chase.— Rod talk 11:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- I've adjusted the coords a bit to correspond more to the built-up area of the village (and made them a bit less overprecise). Deor (talk) 11:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Witham Friary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927210604/http://www.mendip.gov.uk/NewsArticle.asp?id=SX9452-A7817B48 to http://www.mendip.gov.uk/NewsArticle.asp?id=SX9452-A7817B48
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051125094251/http://www.gomezsmart.free-online.co.uk/places/witham/wfmenu.htm to http://www.gomezsmart.free-online.co.uk/places/witham/wfmenu.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)