Talk:With God on Our Side (book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Reviews

Looking for 3rd party information on this book. So far, found a review here. Trying to figure out now if this is a legit source or not. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 00:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Someone put a notability tag on this article. This article appears to meet several of the criteria listed on WP:BK:

It has an ISBN number
It is listed at the Library of Congress [1]
It is not self published
It is carried by online book sellers [2]

I'm not going to remove the tag as I'm the one who started this article. I'd appreciate if someone in agreement will take care of this bit. If someone disagrees with the above, then an AfD process will probably help to hash things out. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 13:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I'd like to see this article remain, I think it's borderline. Usually for a book to be notable it has to be reviewed by an independent reliable source. I haven't yet found any for this, in the searches I've done the book is mentioned incidentally in an article about Weinstein.

It probably would have been safer to start this topic as a subsection of the Michael Weinstein article instead (at worst it could be merged in). --George100 (talk) 22:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]