Talk:Witches of Belvoir

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lincolnshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occult Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Witches of Belvoir appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 January 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Witches of Belvoir supposedly believed a cat named Rutterkin helped them cast spells?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/January.

Wikipedia

Pronunciation

Belvoir is pronounced beaver. I have made this edit once and had it reverted by someone who claimed it to be vandalism. I grew up in Leicestershire, and as any person from that county will tell you, Belvoir is pronounced beaver. Check out the Belvoir Castle page - or Google it if you don't beleive me. 81.151.231.225 22:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also the Vale of Belvoir page 81.151.231.225 22:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How many?

The lead states there were three witches and gives their names, but the next paragraph said other women were accused and found to have "consorted with spirits", and it is three of these other women who are in the picture. Were they not also witches of Belvoir? How many were there in total? Seems contradictory.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 03:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How many?

There were three Flowers who worked at the Castle and three other women who did not. Anne Baker, Ellen Greene and Joan Willimot. The woodcut is probably generic. 124.184.164.154 02:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inline citations

From the edit history:2

"Undid revision 752814195 by PBS (talk)Reversed as majority were inline citations (i.e. references) not footnotes.)" (diff) by user:AnonNep

While not all footnotes are inline citations and not all references are in footnotes, all inline citations within a <ref>...</ref> pairs are foot/end notes.

In this case there are both inline citations (notes) and a reference. -- PBS (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was a single reference from 1852. There's nothing wrong with attempting a WP:BOLD revert but being in the majority certainly helps. If you want a majority note/ref format then reformat all the incline cites (once you've read them & verified content) and locate the 1852 ref & do so again. Matching up citation styles is secondary to reading & verifying the sources. If you can't do it, leave it for someone who can. AnonNep (talk) 18:44, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone tell me the date that the case happened

Also include more reasons for why they where accused of witchcraft 185.69.145.182 (talk) 10:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]