Talk:Wit (film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
References to use
[edit]- Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
- McConnell, Terrance (2009). "'She's DNR!' 'She's Research!': Conflicting Role-Related Obligations in Wit". In Shapshay, Sandra (ed.). Bioethics at the Movies. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 186–204. ISBN 0801890772.
Exemplary
[edit]This is quite possibly the best article about a film I have ever read on Wikipedia. Neither a stub nor a rambling piece of fancruft, this article includes all the relevant information about its subject, and is written with brevity, simplicity, and a bit of elegance, in addition to being completely free of spelling and grammatical errors. Nicely done, whoever you are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.133.107 (talk) 05:00, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
In fact, because I wish more articles on this site were this brief, simple, and elegant, I've made taken the "start class" tag away. It's completely unnecessary. The article is good as it is, and needn't be spoiled by making edits, simply because they can be made.
W;t
[edit]I've added this: "(alson promoted with a semicolon as W;t)" after the film's title, as per the conclusion reached in Talk:WALL-E, which was promoted, also typographically incorrectly, with an interpunct/middledot (as WALL·E). --Dario1250 (talk) 21:45, 10/27/2008 (UTC)