Talk:Wiseana umbraculata

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lepidoptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name of species

According to the Encyclopedia of Life and the New Zealand Organisms Registry the preferred name for this species is Wiseana umbraculata. Unless other editors object I intend to rename this article. Ambrosia10 (talk) 16:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are some databases that use the -us spelling, but that's virtually absent from published sources (compare [1] with [2]; the only exception I can see is the first ref here) and it's easily explainable as an error due to the species being originally assigned to the genus Pielus. Wiseana is feminine in Latin, and as far as I can see umbraculatus' is your vanilla flavour adjective for 'having umbraculi' (so no, not some weird declension where the feminine also takes -us). – Uanfala (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]