Talk:Wisconsin Board of Commissioners of Public Lands

Wisconsin constitution

I removed the ordinal number from the Constitution; in retrospect, this probably isn't the best place to discuss the history of the Wisconsin Constitution. (I had put "first approved," which was changed to "second.") So now it just reads "the Wisconsin constitution, approved in 1848." Thoughts? Cheers--Baron Larf 19:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies-the wording was unclear so I made the change-Thank you-RFD (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Justification for 'importance'

I am an experienced Wikipedian, but have never spent much time on assessments (quality, importance). So as I am about to do a large number of manual changes, I am going to paste this justification in each one.

I am going through all the executive department articles and assessing them all as 'mid' importance, because I believe they clearly fall into the criteria: "The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the study of Wisconsin." It is a good idea to know what the Wisconsin DNR is, for example (because it may make national news, or might be the point of contact for a scientists biology research, etc), but not "vital." LaurentianShield (talk) 01:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]