Jump to content

Talk:Wirral line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nonsense edit

[edit]

Description of services in edit by 81.102.162.34 bears no relation to that described in the National Rail Timetable, or by the Merseyrail website. --RFBailey 17:42, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Former stations

[edit]

I'm not sure that the list of former stations should be included in this article. Apart from one (Warren), none are on lines which are part of the Wirral Line as understood today. I think a separate list of "Disused railway stations on the Wirral" or something similar should be created instead. --RFBailey 20:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's feasible, I created it more out of recognition for the railway history of the borough, although while I guess they're not on lines considered part of the Wirral Line itself they are formed from branches off current lines, one reason I chose to add the ones I did rather than including stations on the West Kirby-Hooton Branch. Also there is still evidence of the track leading from Birkenhead North to the Liscard/Seacombe branch on current (though long unused) lines. I'd personally say they should stay however maybe a sub-division of the current "List of closed railway stations in Britain" could have a facility brought into it that divides stations into counties, therefore grouping disused Merseyside stations together? (Stuey 182 01:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

If it helps there is already a list that includes closed stations on Merseyside "List of railway stations in Merseyside". Shrew 08:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stations Archive

[edit]

This is an archive of the former list of stations which I have replaced with a new template. See the Northern Line (Merseyrail) page for discussion.

New Brighton – Liverpool

[edit]

West Kirby – Liverpool

[edit]

Chester – Liverpool

[edit]

Ellesmere Port – Liverpool

[edit]

"Former stations" (again)

[edit]

Following my earlier comments above (from over a year ago!), I have removed the list of "former stations" from the article. While they are definitely former railway stations situated on the Wirral Peninsula, none of them (save for West Kirby, which is of course still there), none of them are on the present-day Wirral Line, which is the subject of the article. I have pasted the list below, to possibly form the basis of a potential List of disused railway stations on the Wirral Peninsula article. For the purpose of this article, they are off-topic. --RFBailey 19:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Former Stations

[edit]

Incorrect labeling

[edit]

Sorry about this, but I'm a bit of a noob at editing. Its only a small error, so if someone can get around to fixing it (as I don't know how to edit captions) then that's groovy. Anyway, the picture at the top is labelled as a train at liverpool central. Its actually Moorfields Station, which I know as I have gone through there every weekend for years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.111.79 (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you view the full sized image, the signs clearly say 'Liverpool Central'. Moorfields and Central do look very similar though, so it's an easy mistake to make. Raywil (talk) 21:48, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Before being bold I thought I would check here to see if others thought it would be appropriate to add the Merseyrail logo to the infobox. To me the Wirral Line and Merseyrail go hand in hand so it would be appropriate to have the logo for identification per WP:NFCI. Any thoughts? Raywil (talk) 22:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

plus Added -Decided to just go ahead with it. Also turns out the logo is in the public domain so unlike File:Merseyrail logo.svg can be used on any page without restrictions. Raywil (talk) 00:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incidents

[edit]

Am I alone in thinking that the "Incidents" section includes a quite excessive amount of minor detail, as a proportion of the article as a whole, and compared with other railway line articles? I think some of these incidents are so minor as not to be worth mentioning (e.g. a derailment inside the depot), and at any rate I think all of them ought to be described more briefly. Alarics (talk) 10:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're not alone. However, Wikipedia:Notability (railway incidents) has not yet achieved consensus for acceptance, and, it seems, may never do. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh dear. Well, let us just use our common sense and hope for the best. I will prune some of it. Alarics (talk) 16:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wirral Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Wirral Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wirral line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Merseyrail which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:31, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Attached KML/Wirral line

[edit]

Can somebody create Template:Attached KML/Wirral line ? 92.71.60.62 (talk) 15:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean? What does Template:Wirral Line diagram not cover? Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
KML is the geographical data that can be used to create an interactive map. Have a look at M53 motorway, top right corner, you have a little icon labelled "Route map", you can zoom in, see all the other landmarks, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.60.62 (talk) 16:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wirral_line&oldid=1210980530"