Talk:Winter Madness/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 23:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have gone through the article and copy edited it. Please forgive me for any mistakes and please feel free to fix anything I did. The only issue I have is the following sentence, as I don't understand it.
- " "Winter Madness" ranked third in the timeslot and was the only episode getting more viewers, going up 22 percent." {up 22 percent from what?)
- Meaning that it did better by 22 percent [rating] from the previous episode. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I will place the article on hold.
Xtzou (Talk) 23:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused: }
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Good work!