Talk:Wing loading
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wing loading article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Benefits?
[edit]Aircraft are getting higher and higher wing loadings, but does It have a major advantage? I mean lower drag and gust resistance sure, but it decreases efficiency and reduces turning performance. Is there a reason that outweighs the disadvantages? I might have not read the article well enough idk. Cheers <3 Taffy boeing b 17 (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Try asking the question at the reference desk, this talk page is only for discussing problems with or improvements to the article. Talk page guidelines are here, another guideline is WP:NOTFORUM. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 19:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- got it. Cheers <3 Taffy boeing b 17 (talk) 20:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- B-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- B-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- B-Class fluid dynamics articles
- Fluid dynamics articles