Jump to content

Talk:Wine fault

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleWine fault was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 4, 2006Good article nomineeListed
May 8, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA

[edit]

Good enough for a good article by my standards. Keep up the good work. savidan(talk) (e@) 08:43, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A bit too scientific?

[edit]

While the information here is excellent, I wonder if it might be better to focus more on the effects of the faults. I know that information is there, but it seems to me that it should be a bit more prominent. Spectre 25gt 03:42, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spectre 25gt, I was just wondering what you mean by "effects", as this statement is rather ambiguous. Are you referring to things such as the economic impact of wine faults? Thanks §ĉҺɑʀκs 14:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm referring to the effects on the flavor, mouthfeel, etc. Spectre 25gt 00:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Volatile acidity

[edit]

The former VA article has been merged with this one for now. But there's a good article from Wine & Spirit mag that mikght inspire someone to resuscitate the VA article if they wanted to.... FlagSteward 11:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hangover

[edit]

I would really like to know which of these substances can cause hangovers. The Acetaldehyde and Ethanol articles suggest that acetaldehyde is the main factor aside from dehydration.Brallan 15:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 05:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Wine fault/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

This article is woefully inadequate in terms of number of references overall. In addition, the lead section is too short and does not summarize the entire article. OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Substantial of time has passed, yet there is no improvement made on the article since this GAR took place. I am now delisting this article from GA. OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear phrase

[edit]

Can anyone say with certainty what this phrase is supposed to be?

"...that can introduce materials off aromas..."

Merleblanc (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oxidation

[edit]

The section on oxidation is very poor. On ethyl acetate "the compound does not contribute to the volatile acidity." This is incorrect, from Bryce rankine's "Making Good Wine" section on Volatile acidity "acetic acid and it's ester, ethyl acetate". Also from this article " impart nail polish remover, glue, or varnish type aromas." Ethyl acetate gives vinegar taste, nail polish smell is usually acetaldehyde. On acetaldehyde, the article says "imparts a sherry type character to the wine which can also be described as green apple, sour and metallic." While the sherry part is true the rest is very inaccurate, green apple is usually malic apple, sour and metallic is not a good description of acetaldehyde at all. This section is causing people to get a very confused view of common wine faults and should probably be deleted or changed by someone with suitable expertise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.74.179 (talk) 20:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fruit flies

[edit]

I was looking for Fruit flies, but it is not on the list, shouldn't it be? Although google is even less helpful ("drosophila stress odorant" is mainly CO2 and not the thing) --Squidonius (talk) 00:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wine fault. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of cited sources

[edit]

There's a general lack of cited sources for much of the article 136.57.34.200 (talk) 17:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]