Jump to content

Talk:Windsor Gardens station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Windsor Gardens station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • "not accessible. The only access" This is potentially confusing because you're using access to mean two things in very short order. Perhaps you could say something like "it does not support accessibility" or similar?
    •  Done Reworded.
  • "Franklin Line station" in lead, "Franklin Branch" in infobox but that link is piped to "Norfolk County Railroad" which then redirects to "New York and New England Railroad".... to say this is mildly confusing (to me) would be an understatement!
    • I've made the link in the infobox go to Franklin Line. It is a bit confusing - the Franklin Branch is the physical section of track that the Franklin Line service operates on, though colloquially they're often conflated. That section of track originated as the Norfolk County Railroad, which became part of the NY&NE. I've reworded a few things to clarify.
  • "Norwood, just north of the Walpole border" probably worth reiterating this is Massachusetts.
    •  Done
  • Engamore Lane is mentioned in the infobox but nowhere else.
    •  Done
  • You then use "The Norfolk County Railroad opened"... in the prose, so perhaps this needs explanation?
    • Per above, hopefully my rewordings help a bit with clarity.
  • Do all the alternative names with bold links have redirects here? Winslow(s) doesn't appear to, can you check the others?
    • I did create redirects for all of them. "Winslow(s)" means that both "Winslow" and Winslows" were used - often interchangably. That's pretty common for early railway stations.
  • "Walpole.[8][12][9]:365 " order.
    •  Done
  • "accessible.[19][20][3] " order.
    •  Done
  • ISBNs should be consistently formatted.
    •  Done

That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! I believe I've addressed all your comments. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk07:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Pi.1415926535 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough (in terms of GA promotion), hook fact present and cited. Article sourced throughout, no obvious issues with referencing (will obviously have been vetted for this at GAN as well). Hook seems interesting (at least to this European who is used to big public stations) and uncontroversial. Article long enough. QPQ has been done. I would say this one is good to go. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ X 16:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To T:DYK/P5