Talk:Windrow composting

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment: Sustainability Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Merge suggestion

It seems to me that this article is too short to merit being kept separate from the compost windrow turner article and they could be easily combined and a redirect put in place. Plymouths 19:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree that it's a bit short, however I would suggest the real issue is it needs expansion or attention from an expert. This article should be more detailed than the windrow turner article.--Alex 08:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental technology template

I'd like to replace the Environmental technology template with one that matches the standard navbox style, i.e. horizontal instead of vertical, collapsing and typically placed at the bottom of article pages. I've done a mock up of what this would look like at {{User:Jwanders/ET}}. Figured this was a big enough change that I should post before going ahead with it. Please discuss here--jwanders^Talk 22:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd vote for a merge, with windrow composting, without which it is really meaningless Red58bill (talk) 02:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge suggestion

Advertisement