Talk:Windows SideShow

Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

I thought this was a terrible idea, until this article pointed out some of the applications of a second screen. Are there any other ways Microsoft and other companies will be using this technology? --M.Neko 06:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture?

I think it would be a great idea if there was a picture of this new feature. It would show an example of the feature for people who might not understand it. --69.40.174.133 22:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture added

Have added a screenshot of Windows SideShow executing on a new Windows Mobile renderer (Ikanos Connectivity Framework) which is currently in Beta. James (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Is Windows SS popular at all?

Just wanted to know whether this feature is popular. I knew about it during the development of Vista but not heard much at all since. Perhaps it is laying dormant until the second generation vista based products come out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.133.210 (talk) 23:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PortalPlayer link broke

It looks like the PortalPlayer website has expired. I don't know of any equivalent sites, should I just remove it? 82.8.177.0 (talk) 15:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Windows SideShow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/8/f/98f3fe47-dfc3-4e74-92a3-088782200fe7/TWDT05004_WinHEC05.ppt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://download.microsoft.com/download/A/D/F/ADF1347D-08DC-41A4-9084-623B1194D4B2/SideShow_TV-Set-Top.docx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link rot

Both URLs in this article are completely dead. The first one redirects to the main Microsoft download center page (As Microsoft suppresses HTTP 404 errors) and the second one leads to a 404 page. Microsoft must be really distancing themselves from this technology. TheSystemGuy64 (talk) 12:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]