Talk:Windows Product Activation/GA2
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 21:44, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Criterion
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This is to start you off, full review on the way in the next few days.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Good Job. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 21:41, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]Please do not change the status of the criterion, the reviewer will change that their selfs.
I fixed the nonfree use rationales. Please check them out. --Michael Kourlastalk – contribs 02:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Fixed -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 20:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Done Pass GA. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 21:41, 6 February 2010 (UTC)