Talk:Windows Media Encoder

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Studio Edition

The ref has broken. Matthew_hk t c 13:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

so rotten as to be unusable

I'm sure the codec itself is fantastic, but i'm having trouble getting to a point where I can even make an objective assessment. Is anyone else finding the supplied user interface so buggy and mind-bendingly slow / bottlenecked as to be functionally broken? I've ended up at this page sort of as a sideline of going off to see if anyone else has used that SDK to make something a little quicker. IE something that doesn't typically take two or three minutes to switch between certain tabs, or entries in a source list, when I click between them on setting up an encode from one or more 250-mb-ish (15 minute) SVCD MPG2 sources. God only knows what it's doing. Perhaps re-reading and re-analysing each file in full every. single. time. or something. Also, having some kind of batch encode function would be nice... just figured out that if I hit Start now, everything on my source list would be lumped into the same file with the same name (or perhaps the last one on the list would overwrite everything that went before). It manages to do the clever thing of automatically naming it when you load in - and remembering the basic encode settings (eg bitrate) - but doesn't auto change the name or allow you to set "use same as input" or any kind of renaming rule (and forgets even the vaguely more advanced settings - like resolution).

Arrrrgh. Most freeware tools work better than this. Was it not use-tested before release?

so, off we go, maybe there's some in the article maintext? 193.63.174.10 (talk) 17:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wmediaencoder9series.PNG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Wmediaencoder9series.PNG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 19 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Wmediaencoder9series.PNG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:14, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Windows Media Encoder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Windows Media Encoder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090113032417/http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/ork2000/HA011382331033.aspx to http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/ork2000/HA011382331033.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Compare Features Windows Media Encoder vs Expression Encoder

I have a copy of Microsoft's official 1.08.2010 page, which compares the capabilities of Windows Media Encoder and the replacement Expression Encoder. Perhaps someone will want to move this table to articles or maybe it can still help, so I downloaded this page for free download (link available 1 year since last download) --185.52.142.238 (talk) 16:52, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]