Talk:Windows-1251
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Currently, the code point table looks like this.
Windows-1251 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | xA | xB | xC | xD | xE | xF | |
0x | unused | |||||||||||||||
1x | ||||||||||||||||
2x | SP | ! | " | # | $ | % | & | ' | ( | ) | * | + | , | - | . | / |
3x | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | : | ; | < | = | > | ? |
4x | @ | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O |
5x | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | [ | \ | ] | ^ | _ |
6x | ` | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o |
7x | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z | { | | | } | ~ | |
8x | Ђ | Ѓ | ‚ | ѓ | „ | … | † | ‡ | € | ‰ | Љ | ‹ | Њ | Ќ | Ћ | Џ |
9x | ђ | ‘ | ’ | “ | ” | • | – | — | ™ | љ | › | њ | ќ | ћ | џ | |
Ax | NBSP | Ў | ў | Ј | ¤ | Ґ | ¦ | § | Ё | © | Є | « | ¬ | SHY | ® | Ї |
Bx | ° | ± | І | і | ґ | µ | ¶ | · | ё | № | є | » | ј | Ѕ | ѕ | ї |
Cx | А | Б | В | Г | Д | Е | Ж | З | И | Й | К | Л | М | Н | О | П |
Dx | Р | С | Т | У | Ф | Х | Ц | Ч | Ш | Щ | Ъ | Ы | Ь | Э | Ю | Я |
Ex | а | б | в | г | д | е | ж | з | и | й | к | л | м | н | о | п |
Fx | р | с | т | у | ф | х | ц | ч | ш | щ | ъ | ы | ь | э | ю | я |
Comparing it to Microsoft's Windows 1251 reference website, which I would call authoritative, I guess it's wrong: the code points from 0x00 to 0x1F are filled with C0 control codes, 0x7F is the DEL character. --Abdull 11:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
"Obsolete" is POV
[edit]If you go looking for online material in Russian etc., you will probably find a lot more in CP-1251 than in Unicode. Unicode certainly is the "wave of the future", however calling 1251 "obsolete" seems premature. LADave (talk) 16:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Is it Code Page 1251 or not?
[edit]I am very puzzled by this statement: "The following table shows Windows-1251. Each character is shown with its decimal code and its Unicode equivalent. (Codepage given below is Latin-Cyrillic, not Windows 1251)." Either it is 1251 or it isn't. No? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.106.220.83 (talk) 14:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is. Fixed, thanks. --5ko (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)