Talk:Wind lens

Sketch

looks like the artist sketch has the wind backwards.69.163.56.66 (talk) 17:59, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

It looks that way but the sketch is correct. What happens is that the wind (coming from left) pushes against the ring, which bends the air away from the center of the stream (creating a low pressure zone behind the blades), and the low pressure makes the blades spin faster. Watch the video (see external links) and it perhaps explains it better. Cool idea.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:40, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

--Hot cake syrup (talk) 00:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)==Notability and uniqueness== Is this a notable concept? The refs are pretty slim. This one barely mentions the concept.[1] This one has a single sentence.[2] This is a very short profile.[3] That doesn't appear sufficient for a standalone article.

Separately, this seems to be essentially the same as Ducted propeller or Ducted fan, albeit used to produce energy rather than thrust.

Either way, perhaps it'd be better merged into Wind turbine, as it's simply a minor variation.   Will Beback  talk  21:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Or even better, Unconventional wind turbines, which already has entries for variations like this.   Will Beback  talk  21:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I support merging into Unconventional wind turbines Ernestfax^Talk 14:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I also support merging into Unconventional wind turbines. Johnfos (talk) 16:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

support merge. This doesn't appear to be an original concept. It looks to be a ducted rotor type, invented way back about 1885. --Aflafla1 (talk) 04:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Actually, I've changed my mind. I think the article is non-notable and should be deleted. See this [4] article by Paul Gipe. --Aflafla1 (talk) 04:49, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

I think Wind lens has original structure against other windmills, and many plans have recently been announced to construct wind mills over the Hakata bay. Then this article should be independent in Wikipedia. --Hot cake syrup (talk) 00:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

The Problem with Ducted Rotors

This is a variant of a ducted rotor. The problem with the design is that by the time you add the expense and bulk of the duct around the rotor, you could just as well have made the rotor larger in diameter by a significant factor and skipped the duct. You'd get as much power improvement that way as by using the duct, but at less expense. --Aflafla1 (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Section on problems with wind lens

I urge a section on problems with wind lens. MaynardClark (talk) 04:50, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wind lens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110613082837/http://news.discovery.com:80/tech/lens-wind-turbines-magnify-power.html to http://news.discovery.com/tech/lens-wind-turbines-magnify-power.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)