Talk:ExPlace Wind Turbine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ExPlace Wind Turbine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto.

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Capacity factor

Does anyone have any info regarding the capacity factor of this turbine? I've always heard that it was primairly placed for good PR and that the wind is not very good. 216.191.239.82 19:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you ask {{Google}}? windshare toronto capacity factor finds several sources, including:

Cosh, Colby. "Windmills aren't the answer". Energy Probe. Retrieved 2008-10-18. {{cite web}}: Text "2006-11-21" ignored (help)

which claims a capacity factor of "14.7% in its first 42 months of operation" for the WindShare turbine. Of course no commercial wind farm operator would site a wind farm in a major urban center, because the wind-shadowing effects of a large built-up urban area would tend to make for a poor wind resource. A wind turbine in an urban center exists to demonstrate the technology to large numbers of people, rather than to achieve the highest possible capacity factor. On the other hand, the proximity to electricity users gives the urban turbine a considerable advantage in terms of low transmission line power loss, and no worries about competing for available grid bandwidth. And by the way, the naysaying source I cited above needs updating because it does not account for newer (positive) findings about handling wind power on the grid (see Wind power#Intermittency and penetration limits). --Teratornis (talk) 06:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

facts aren’t really “naysaying”. starting with the rated capacity of 750kw, times 24 hours, times 365 days, gives a theoretical 6570 mwh a year. the actual claim of “1000 MWh” is 14.8%. as for siting, any wind turbine has an optimal wind speed, and a maximum. being on the lakefront, not downtown, with regular onshore winds, seems to work just fine, because 10-12 knots is its design wind speed. 64.137.143.72 (talk) 15:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Windshare cooperative

This article's name would seem to indicate that it is about the energy cooperative Windshare, but the article seems to focus only on this one turbine. Not sure if the turbine is notable on its own, but I would like to see more here about the cooperative. Gobonobo ^T ^C 07:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it's a turbine that millions of people see each day. --scruss (talk) 23:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Power Output

Is there a reason why the heading for the model says 750kW, but under power output it says 650kW? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjhoyle (talk • contribs) 12:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While the turbine is rated at 750 kW, that would have been with the originally promised 58 m diameter blade set. As these were never made available, the turbine is de-reated to around 650 kW --scruss (talk) 23:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WindShare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]