Talk:Wim Kok

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wim Kok article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Organized Labour

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Untitled

I agree that allegations about Kok and the PvdA somehow being responsible for the Fortuyn assassination are unjustified. I would even go as far as to say that they are malicious. Yet, I'm a bit uneasy with the words "confused masses." Anyone else have an opinion? 213.84.239.37 20:31, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And more uneasiness: Kok resigned at the 16th of April (see the Dutch article), while Fortuyn was killed at the 6th of May. This article suggests Kok was still full in function during the assassination. And that is, I regret to say, not according to the facts. Jeff5102 10:40, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Willem Kok

"Willem Kok" doesn't redirect to this page. Could someone please add that? Salopian (talk) 16:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

rework

The intro delivered more facts than the story below it. I've reworked it, so that it reads without any doubles. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 08:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And the long intro is back. Now the article tells the same story twice. Once with, and once without sub-headers. What is the point of that?Jeff5102 (talk) 10:18, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, again: would anyone object if I cut down the intro, so that this article will stop telling the same story twice? Otherwise I'll work on it.Jeff5102 (talk) 10:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comments

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:39, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wim Kok IV?

Wim Kok was never called "Wim Kok IV" by anyone. Even the reference for it mentions him as "Willem Kok" without any roman number added. I'll wait for two weeks to see any sound argument. If not, I'll rework it together with all the double information in this article.Jeff5102 (talk) 12:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wim Kok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.coenverbraak.nl/peper.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120915023218/http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/regering/het-kabinet/over-de-regering/ministers-van-staat/dr-w-kok to http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/regering/het-kabinet/over-de-regering/ministers-van-staat/dr-w-kok

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]