Talk:Wim Eijk
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Could someone edit the reference styles infobox, (because I can't figure out how)? Mgr. Eijk's informal reference style is mentioned as being cardinal, but since he isn't (yet) a cardinal, his reference style should just be bishop. Montymark (talk) 08:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeh and with the new big picture it looks like crap.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabine1981 (talk • contribs) 12:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Untitled 2
[edit]Eijk cardinal: http://aartsbisdom.nl/Nieuws/PublishingImages/Nieuwsberichten%20Aartsbisdom%202012/02%20Februari/cons%20d%20kl.jpg
dead link
[edit]The fifth link is no longer available: http://www.communio.nl/index.php?id=19&taal=nl