Talk:Wilson Bikram Rai

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Nepal

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Deleted everything, no sources left

User:Atlantic306 I am sorry I did not realise you were also editing the page. When you said it can't be deleted, I decided to remove crappy stuff instead. I left two reliable sources at first but checking further found that those don't support the article either. So, now there's no sources left but I left the first sentence and filmography anyway despite that.

Anyway, the other page Takme Buda can surely be deleted, as there are no reliable sources covering that subject at all. Can you delete that one? Thanks! MySock1 (talk) 18:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Removing reliable sources is extremely disruptive Atlantic306 (talk) 18:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Isn't the point of reliable sources to verify things? Why can't we remove sources that are reliable if they don't verify the claim that it's apparently supporting? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MySock1 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- They should be used to add content not removed. Have you edited with a different username as you seem very cocksure for an editer registered this afternoon? Atlantic306 (talk) 19:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - shit! I just wrote a zillion words about everything and looks like it just got lost. Anyway, tldr; was I have edited some before but this is my first username, maybe I look knowledgeable because I am being guided by a friend who encouraged me to join officially.

But since you called me "cocksure" I am going to leave for you to do with this page what you will and go do something else; I will just have to take my friend's word that you are a good person (I hope you have a good reason for treating me unkindly, cancelling my edits and warning me and threatening to ban me, when I have only been following instructions given at reliable source and verifiability pages) Ciao! MySock1 (talk) 20:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]