Talk:Willow ptarmigan

Willow ptarmigan has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 3, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Alaska High‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birds Low‑importance

Willow ptarmigan is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Males do take care of young

I changed the statement that only females raise the young. Males often protect the young and often attack intruders. The even attack Grizzly Bears! Frankyboy5 22:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Willow Ptarmigan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 23:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Cwmhiraeth, fairly long time since I last reviewed a bird article, so I'll take this one. FunkMonk (talk) 23:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
First off, last sentence under description needs a source, likewise with the part about hybridisation (could need a link) under taxonomy.

Thank you for taking this on. I have added one citation and removed one sentence to which I could not find a reference. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The etymology lacks a source as well.

Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It strikes me as odd that there is no habitat and distribution section? And instead, there seems to be bits and pieces about habitat sprinkled about, mostly in the description section for some reason? Could this be collected?

Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is still a bit about habitat under description, but perhaps it's there for a reason? FunkMonk (talk) 15:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"(though the red grouse does not adopt a winter plumage)" Why use an obsolete name, and not just say the British population or some such? And if you keep it, shouldn't it be capitalised?

Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"but in the winter they are white with black tails" From the photo, it appears the head and neck is black as well? And the tail is not really black?

What? Deducing facts from images? ;-) The text sources mention some black feathers in the tail so I have edited these statements. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heheh, should be ok as long as you don't cite the image itself! Reading/looking closer, I'm also confused by the fact that the male on an image has a black head and white body, though the text says it would be all white. Any reason for this? FunkMonk (talk) 15:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I guess that there may be some variation in the winter plumage across the range. Most of the websites I have found are US based and presumably really only cover the birds found there. Then again, the bird seems to change its plumage several times a year, new feathers growing through its old plumage, so it is frequently changing its appearance. I could state that the winter plumage is largely white but varies between subspecies. What do you think? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think mentioning the variation under description is good. FunkMonk (talk) 23:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"most numerous of the three species of Ptarmigan" Should it even be capitalised here, as it is not referring to a particular species?

Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The word ptarmigan is neither linked or explained what it refers to.

Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Hybridises often with Tetrao tetrix and Bonasa bonasia" It/The Willow Ptarmigan hybridises often? Otherwise it seems like how one would write a brief field guide or something, but we have plenty of space to use.

Expanded. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"retreated northwards like its tundra habitat." With its tundra habitat?

Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the gallery is needed. Unless there is a specific point to be conveyed, the MOS states they shouldn't be used.

Removed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise, the image layout is a bit funny. No image under description? Three on the left of the bullet points under taxonomy?

There's not much room for an image in the Description section because it would pinch the text or continue down into the next section if on the right. The 3 images on the left of Taxonomy illustrate different subspecies. I could put them all on the right. I could look for an image of dwarf willow for the Diet section. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, at least to see how it would look like with that layout. We can always change it back. FunkMonk (talk) 15:08, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some image rearrangement. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks better. FunkMonk (talk) 00:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If any of the subspecies are downright invalid now, they should be listed as synonyms instead, and the ones that are somewhat agreed upon should stay in the taxonomy section.

I'm happy to accept what it says on the IBC page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting it also is present in America. Any source mention when this was colonised by the bird?

It's not far from Siberia to Alaska. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of info about diet is present under behaviour, why is that not in the diet section?

Moved and abbreviated to remove duplication. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The intro says "in a scrape on the ground". The article says "in a shallow depression in the ground". Should be consistent.

Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now, only thing is habitat is still mentioned for some populations under description, would make more sense under the newly created section? FunkMonk (talk) 00:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've had another look at this. The habitat is only mentioned in the Description section inasmuch as it is attached to the mention of other species with which the Willow Ptarmigan might be confused. I have moved the bit about the habitat of the Red Grouse. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:11, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, pass! FunkMonk (talk) 06:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:02, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Environmental physiology

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 5 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jbrian7 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Erinkaline, Jlebo14.

— Assignment last updated by Jessicaphillips10 (talk) 01:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review jbrian7

I did not see your changes on the sandbox page, so I have nothing to review and edit. However, the article is great and I think this information would best be added under the behavior section. 01:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Jlebo14 (talk)Jlebo14 (talk) 01:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Red Grouse

Heads up: IOC are splitting Red Grouse as a separate species Lagopus scotica, effective 1 July 2024 with IOC version 14.2 - MPF (talk) 20:17, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we'll need to split the article, the link you provided should be a good source when doing so. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 01:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Red Grouse already exists as a stand-alone page, it'll just need revising to change from subspecies to species. On this page it'll mean removing information that relates only to scotica among the subspecies - MPF (talk) 07:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]