Talk:Willow Creek/Southwest 185th Avenue Transit Center/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- Comments
- Consider adding annual ridership in the lead, otherwise it looks good. (I'll leave that to your discretion)
- I find the header "details" rather vague, perhaps it would be better with "facilities" or similar.
- Don't presume readers know what ADA means; for people outside the US it is just a collection of letters. Instead write it out in full and put the acronym in parenthesis.
- Mention any large public facilities in the vicinity in the second section. Two facilities are in the lead, although they also need to be in the body.
- It seems that the two bottom external links are not about the station, but rather about the Willow Creek Center. This information should either be incorporated into the article (if relevant) or left out.
Mostly small issues to see to, and then the article should pass. Don't hesitate if you have any questions. Arsenikk (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- Looks like you took care of the ADA item.
- I changed the "Details" header, but no matter what, it is hard to really define that type of section.
- As to large public facilities in the area, I repeated the two that were in the lead. The station is much more suburban with mostly residential and a strip mall in the area, designed more for local residents to go there and then off to work versus commuters traveling to this station via MAX for work (e.g. large park and ride lot).
- I added the ridership numbers to the lead. Previously I had left it out as the numbers are dated. Though in trying to find newer numbers, I did find a little info to add regarding the Red Line.
- Regarding the ELs for the PCC center, the reason they are there is mainly to provide info on the PCC center until an article is written on that center. I don't have as much time as I used to for major work such as article creation, so this is sort of a compromise, as other than mentioning that the PCC workforce center is at the stop, that info belongs in the article on that, and not here, but since there is no article yet, hard to put it there. Once that article is created, then the ELs should go. Let me know if you still think they should go.
- I think that is it, let me know if there is anything else. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
- Regarding the EL, I would have removed them, but I won't hold it against the review as you have a valid point. Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and the pass. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
- Regarding the EL, I would have removed them, but I won't hold it against the review as you have a valid point. Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)