This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
I've never heard of Mr. Willies Mchunu before today, but I have serious concerns about an article in which everything except the two sentence lead revolves around a single political controversy. I think the article would need to have more about his biography, life history, and events before this one. As it stands, the article probably needs to be trimmed or modified, but as I said, I know nothing about the situation and wouldn't know where to begin with no background to work from. —Torchiesttalkedits22:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also not in a position to add anything beyond what's been in the media over the last couple of days. But my sense is that the article is incomplete (only really dealing with two well known controversies) rather than NPOV in terms of how it deals with them. i.e. it needs further development and more information.
41.132.60.222 (talk) 10:35, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]