Jump to content

Talk:Williams FW08

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

6-wheeler

[edit]

Sources disagree about the name of the 6-wheeled FW08:

So what should we call it? DH85868993 (talk) 12:46, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The 1983 edition of Autocourse states that "[1983] cars known as FW08C (FW08B being six-wheeler project abandoned after change to regulations)", which would make sense given the chronology of the projects.--Midgrid(talk) 13:17, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Last week's issue of Autosport magazine ("1982 retro" special) also refers to the six-wheeler as the FW08B.--Midgrid(talk) 19:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's sufficient evidence in favour of "FW08B". Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 02:58, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Points scored

[edit]

Looking at the 1982 F1 Constructors Championship it doesn't seem to be right. There were less points scored with the old car (FW07). By my calculations the FW07 scored 13 points in 1982, and that brings the total to 57. acok97 06:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.239.34.101 (talk) 05:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I make it 14 points for the FW07 in 1982: 6 for Reutemann's second place in South Africa + 2 for Rosberg's fifth place in the same race + 6 for Rosberg's second place at the US West Grand Prix. How do you arrive at your total of 13? DH85868993 (talk) 12:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, for some reason I took that 5th place as 1 point, which isn't right. acok97 01:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acok97 (talkcontribs)

No worries. DH85868993 (talk) 02:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Williams FW08. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]