Talk:William Shaw (laboratory owner)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Autism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

William Shaw & Great Plains Laboratory

Is this entry an advertisement? Notes & references missing; no section on the issue of analytical vs clinical validity and the possible harm to patients of confusing the two. Mahnut 05:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahnut (talk • contribs) [reply]

Consensus on Great Plains Lab

Other references to illustrate the consensus that Great Plains Lab offers discredited testing. ^[1] ^[2] I don't believe it's necessary to add any more citations, but other editors may disagree and wish to add them. Experts around the world agree that IgG allergy testing is discredited.^[3] --ScienceFlyer (talk) 23:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Chabane, H.; Doyen, V.; Bienvenu, F.; Adel-Patient, K.; Vitte, J.; Mariotte, D.; Bienvenu, J. (2018). "Les dosages d'IgG anti-aliments : méthodes et pertinence clinique des résultats. Position du groupe de travail de biologie de la Société française d'allergologie". Revue Française d'Allergologie. 58 (4): 334–357. doi:10.1016/j.reval.2018.01.007.
^ Kelso, John M. (2018). "Unproven Diagnostic Tests for Adverse Reactions to Foods". The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 6 (2): 362–365. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.021.
^ "The myth of IgG food panel testing". American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Retrieved 8 April 2021.

[1] Chabane, H.; Doyen, V.; Bienvenu, F.; Adel-Patient, K.; Vitte, J.; Mariotte, D.; Bienvenu, J. (2018). "Les dosages d'IgG anti-aliments : méthodes et pertinence clinique des résultats. Position du groupe de travail de biologie de la Société française d'allergologie". Revue Française d'Allergologie. 58 (4): 334–357. doi:10.1016/j.reval.2018.01.007.

[2] Kelso, John M. (2018). "Unproven Diagnostic Tests for Adverse Reactions to Foods". The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 6 (2): 362–365. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.021.

[3] "The myth of IgG food panel testing". American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Retrieved 8 April 2021.

[1]

[2]

[3]