Talk:William Ronald

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Citation Problem

The end of this article is clearly directly quoted from somewhere - it must be rewritten or cited or else it constitutes plagiarism. --Ggbroad 12:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking over this article it seems to me that the bulk of it is ripped straight out of some article or exhibition catalogue (those passages that are written in the present tense are an obvious giveaway.) Would the principle author please rewrite it accordingly, or else I will have to start making major deletions. --Ggbroad 12:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's very obvious that large portions of this article still consist of direct quotations from secondary sources (and on article in particular.) Simply dropping a citation at the end of the page isn't sufficient - the rules are very clear. Direct quotations must be acknowledged as such. Accordingly, I will begin to massively revise this article by Saturday, August 19th, 2006 if the appropriate revisions aren't made. --Ggbroad 11:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I indicated, I have reduced this article as it constituted an act of plagiarism. Given a few weeks I will produce an original article. --Ggbroad 19:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reduced article to a stub due to plagiarism

The bulk of this article is copied almost verbatim from a copyrighted article in Artfocus by Penny-Lyn Grossman (available via a Google search). I have therefore reduced the article to a stub until such time as I (or someone else) has time to write a proper, original article on William Ronald. --Ggbroad 19:47, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes

The recent rewriting of this article is a beginning but I'm not sure that Ronald's relocation to Canada can be put down to his fear of the emerging drug culture in the states - the article should mention that he was dropped by the K. gallery, for instance. --Ggbroad 11:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In most respects I liked the previous conclusion to the article better than the current one. Will work on integrating them. --Ggbroad 12:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ronald Mixed Media.jpg

Image:Ronald Mixed Media.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 10:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:William Ronald the hero 1957.jpg

Image:William Ronald the hero 1957.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]