Talk:William Rishanger
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:William Rishanger/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
For a stub article, it has an extraordinary number of references. So many references (4), so little text (3 lines), and in addition an external link to 1911 Britannica whose material is apparently not used. It seems there are large prospects for expansion, and it needs it since there is nothing there but the references and a few lines of text. It is well categorized and tolerably linked. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 18:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 10:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- Stub-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- Stub-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- Stub-Class England-related articles
- Unknown-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages