Talk:William R. Steiger

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why?

Why is there this huge article on an essentially inconsequential, low-ranking government official? His boss's boss has a smaller article... Stevenmitchell (talk) 19:24, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some problems: looks like a resume written by the subject or someone hired by/close to him. In the history an ip (173.73.174.59) adds in a bunch of sentences, particularly in the Controversies section, and is mostly an attempt to defend the subject's actions. Many of the refs are broken now, so it's impossible to verify sources. Far too much info about an essentially minor political appointee embroiled in one conflict, and a minor player in a failed campaign. Thegeneralguy (talk) 05:07, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALSO: this photo does not match/looks like someone younger than the Internet Archive version of his bio from the global health website https://web.archive.org/web/20070701194553/http://www.globalhealth.gov/office/steigerbio.html OrganizetheInternet (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on William R. Steiger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070701194553/http://www.globalhealth.gov/office/steigerbio.html to http://www.globalhealth.gov/office/steigerbio.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Question

The article needs an infobox and I plan on adding one, but should I use template:infobox officeholder or template:infobox person? I don't know which one I should use because he has worked for the U.S. government but not as a senator or representative. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 20:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]